Skip to Content

Securing Vendor Access to Operational Technology (OT) Infrastructure: A Modern Approach Beyond VPNs and Remote Access Tools

28 August 2025 by
PseudoWire

Operational Technology systems have long prioritized deterministic behavior and high availability over rapid innovation or connectivity. However, the convergence of IT and OT environments has increased both efficiency and the attack surface. In such contexts, third-party access becomes not only a necessity but a considerable risk. Maintenance vendors, automation specialists, and control system providers often require remote access to troubleshoot issues, apply firmware updates, or reconfigure components. If this access is not stringently controlled, it opens the door to security breaches with potentially catastrophic consequences.

Risks and Limitations of Traditional VPN and RAT Approaches

Traditionally, organizations have relied on Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) to provide remote access to internal networks. However, VPNs create a flat network architecture where, once authenticated, users can potentially traverse large segments of the environment. This model lacks microsegmentation, enabling lateral movement in the event of credential compromise or malicious behavior. For instance, the infamous Triton malware attack exploited remote access to install malware on safety instrumented systems (SIS), nearly causing physical damage to critical infrastructure.

Additionally, VPN implementations often suffer from poor access control practices. Credentials are shared among multiple vendors, sessions are not time-restricted, and there is typically no granular control or visibility into what actions a remote user is performing. VPN logs are insufficient to reconstruct events forensically, and they rarely integrate with OT-specific monitoring systems.

Remote Access Tools (RATs) present an even greater risk. These tools are often configured to maintain persistent connections, allowing vendors to connect at will without approval or oversight. In some environments, these RATs are configured with auto-login features and always-on services, making them indistinguishable from malicious backdoors. Several high-profile breaches, including attacks on water treatment facilities and manufacturing plants, involved attackers leveraging poorly secured RATs left exposed to the internet or misconfigured with default credentials.

In one real-world incident, a manufacturing firm suffered a ransomware attack that originated from a compromised RAT used by a third-party contractor. The RAT provided always-on access to the plant’s OT network, and once compromised, it allowed the attacker to navigate laterally, disable control systems, and encrypt critical data. This downtime cost the company millions in operational disruption and recovery.

A Modern Architecture for Secure OT Vendor Access

Modern security architectures advocate for a Zero Trust approach that treats all access as untrusted by default. For OT environments, this means placing strict boundaries around assets and using microsegmentation to limit access to only what is necessary. Instead of opening a VPN tunnel to the entire OT environment, organizations can deploy hardened jump servers located in a demilitarized zone (DMZ). These jump servers are configured with multi-factor authentication and integrate with identity management systems to enforce role-based access.

A critical component of this model is Just-in-Time (JIT) access. Vendors request access for a specific time window and purpose. Once approved, credentials are injected dynamically for that session and expire immediately afterward. This eliminates the need for persistent credentials and dramatically reduces the attack surface.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions play a pivotal role in this ecosystem. These systems manage, monitor, and record all privileged sessions, allowing administrators to see exactly who accessed what, when, and what actions they performed. Full session recording and command-level logging ensure that every change made during a session is auditable. If a vendor uploads new firmware, modifies a PLC configuration, or accesses a control interface, it is documented and available for review.

Monitoring and Configuration Change Control

Visibility is essential in OT environments. Modern access solutions must integrate with Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) platforms and ICS-specific intrusion detection systems. Real-time session monitoring can alert operators to suspicious activity during remote sessions, such as unauthorized configuration changes or attempts to disable safety interlocks.

Change management systems should track every configuration change made during vendor sessions. By comparing new configurations to known good baselines, deviations can be flagged automatically. This ensures that unauthorized or unexpected changes do not go unnoticed and helps maintain system integrity. Such systems also support rapid rollback in the event of misconfiguration.

Compliance and Standards Alignment

The proposed architecture aligns with key cybersecurity standards and regulations for industrial environments. IEC 62443 emphasizes zone-based security and secure conduits, while NERC CIP-005 outlines requirements for electronic security perimeters. NIST SP 800-82 offers guidance specific to industrial control systems, reinforcing the need for strict access control and detailed monitoring.

As OT environments continue to converge with IT and expand their connectivity, securing vendor access becomes a mission-critical function. VPNs and RATs, once adequate, now represent significant liabilities. Organizations must adopt modern, layered approaches involving JIT access, jump servers, PAM, and real-time monitoring to ensure that vendor access does not become a pathway for compromise. These strategies not only enhance security but also support regulatory compliance and operational resilience.

PseudoWire 28 August 2025
Share this post
Tags
Archive